Mansfield Park Delights and Horrifies

There are three feature film versions of Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park.  Next to Pride and Prejudice, that particular Austen novel is my favorite.  So, I was happy to discover film versions – sad but true.  Now, I first saw the 1999 version before ever having read the book.  I absolutely loved it!  I loved Alessandro Nivola as the dastardly Mr. Henry Crawford and Frances O’Connor was a vivacious Fanny Price.  I still love that movie version.  It is a unique blend of biography (Austen’s) and fiction (obviously, the book Mansfield Park). There are points where I wish it would follow the book a little more closely, but I really can’t complain with the acting or the script.

Afterwards, I learned of another version.  This one made in 1983 starring Sylvestra La Touzel as Miss Price.  Now, I love this version because it follows the book so well, hence it’s six hour length.   However, I do not like the fact that there is a lot of over-reacting.  Too much, in fact.  Mostly on the part of Ms. La Touzel.  I think that her histrionics are over-the-top and unbelievable (such as when Sir Thomas chastises Fanny for not wanting to marry Mr. Crawford).  That is really the worst part of the entire film.  Other than that, there really is nothing else to detract from the greatness of a good adaptation of the book.

Now, I caught part of Mansfield Park (2007) on PBS one night.  Bad reception deemed I would not get to watch it.  But I recently acquired the film and must say I could not get through it at all.  Which, I suppose, is horrible to say since it was only 1.5 hours.  The reason?  Bad acting, bad costumes, bad make-up and, most importantly, a bad Fanny.  Miss Price is not some wild girl with unkempt clothes and hair (her corset was always peeking out of an extremely low cut bodice) and her hair looked like it never saw a brush in it’s life.  Now, the 1999 version had a more outspoken Fanny, but that worked for the film and the actress.  It seemed to fit just right.  In this film, it seems scandalous.  Maybe because it was so atrociously done. Also, Lady Bertram’s character is horribly rendered as a gossipy, holier-than-thou matriarch.  Heaven forbid! Making Tom Bertram and Mr. Yates into one character is deplorable (especially since Julia Bertram becomes attached to Yates).

One must wonder what the writers were thinking.  There are enough Jane Austen aficionados still today who will descry the ’07 version.  If you cannot remain true to the characters and you employ bad acting, the wrong clothing of the time and a too-swift moving plot, I doubt there is anyone who can enjoy it.

I do find that after watching the 4-6 hour versions of book adaptations, I lose interest in the 1.5-2 hour versions, mainly because they do not follow the books so well and cut out sometimes integral (at least in my eyes) scenes.  However, I still enjoy the ’99 version after seeing the ’83.  I don’t know how anyone could like the ’07 version. 

Advertisements

One thought on “Mansfield Park Delights and Horrifies

  1. i’ve deplored any movie adaptations of “les miserables” that i’ve managed to sit through, but i really heart the play because it sticks so freakin’ well to the book. …or, at least what i could get out of the book. it took me a few years of confused persistence to get through it.i am greatly in love with “lolita”, which is why i agree wholeheartedly with nabakov himself that the kubrick version is an abomination. the 1990s version, however, was outright fantastic. kinda missed a few points here and there, and made up a bit on occasion, and the ending was a smidgen more romanticized than the book, but still freakin’ fantastic.and being the huge “phantom of the opera” jerk-off that i am, i have to say that i do not like the original novella. (i *do* absolutely love susan kay’s rendition [which was selling for $500 a copy when the most recent movie version came out]. i read it so much in high school that i pretty much had the whole thing memorized.) one thing i love about “phantom of the opera” is that nobody else seems to have liked the original novella much, either, because there are so blasted many interpretations it’s like everyone is saying, “gawds, gaston… you really screwed up a perfectly excellent idea!”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s